Monday 28 March 2016

WOGE #548

After a long hunt for black lava and cinder cones that took much of the Easter weekend, 547 from Paul (http://wogepaulvoestermans.blogspot.ca/2016/03/where-on-google-earth-547-in-woge-546.html) was an easier one for me. The red colour was easier to see on Google Earth, and after search Utah and Arches National Park, I moved south to Australia. There I found Kata Tjuta or The Olgas, located just to the west of Uluru.

From Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kata_Tjuta): Kata Tjuta, sometimes written Tjuṯa (Kata Joota), and also known as Mount Olga (or colloquially as The Olgas), are a group of large domed rock formations or bornhardts located about 365 km (227 mi) southwest of Alice Springs, in the southern part of the Northern Territory, central Australia. Uluru, 25 km (16 mi) to the east, and Kata Tjuta / Mount Olga form the two major landmarks within the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park.

The 36 domes that make up Kata Tjuta / Mount Olga cover an area of 21.68 km2 (8.37 sq mi), are composed of conglomerate, a sedimentary rock consisting of cobbles and boulders of varying rock types including granite and basalt, cemented by a matrix of sandstone.

The highest point, Mount Olga, is 1,066 m (3,497 ft) above sea level, or approximately 546 m (1,791 ft) above the surrounding plain (198 m (650 ft) higher than Uluru).[1] Kata Tjuta is located at the eastern end of the Docker River Road.

Contest #548 is not red, but shades of blue, green and beige.



Go here for a bigger version: https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1563/26037026881_f48206c0c0_o.jpg

Rules, tips and previous WoGEs are collected by Felix on his http://woge-felix.blogspot.ca/ blog and a KML file is available with all WoGEs.

No Schott rule this time - to give the geologists a chance to wrest the game away from the non-geologists!

9 comments:

  1. Luis, this is the same picture as I have on my homepage at the moment. And this picture is from http://woge-felix.blogspot.de/2010/12/where-on-google-earth-241.html.

    Maybe you have another one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wow, that's a quick find.

      Delete
    2. Sorry, gentlemen, I was in a hurry on the road and messed up the names...

      Delete
  2. Felix.. you found 548, even if it was already used. I can choose another for 548, or you can proceed with 549. Up to you. Andrew

    ReplyDelete
  3. Andrew, I really did not find the picture. This would mean I would have found a picture I have published myself on Christmas 2010? I would prefer Andrew would publish another #548 ??

    ReplyDelete
  4. I will do that later in the day (it's only 12.30 pm right now).

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete